@article{ART001298225},
author={전일환},
title={Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa"},
journal={Korean Language & Literature},
issn={1229-1730},
year={2008},
number={67},
pages={201-223}
TY - JOUR
AU - 전일환
TI - Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa"
JO - Korean Language & Literature
PY - 2008
VL - null
IS - 67
PB - Korean Language & Literature
SP - 201
EP - 223
SN - 1229-1730
AB - Until now Gasa(歌辭) works have not been classified by the author, the
social, periodical or a material matter/a subject matter, but by the
classifier's view or impression. Thus it is not reasonable to classify "Gasa"
into 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 21, 34 type, etc.
Most of Gasa were written and enjoyed by the gentry in the early
Joseon dynasty. However, after Japanese invasion into Korea, Joseon
society was changed greatly and Gasa were written and enjoyed by the
common people and even by women and Budda monks. That's why it is
needed for Gasa to be classified by the period: the first period of Joseon
and after.
The gentry’s way of life consisted of only two ways: one is social life
(出) and the other is family life(處). The confucians who lived in the rural
country wrote the wise type of Gasa and did their official duties. They
always tried to keep the strict rule of Procrustean literature.
Joseon dynasty witnessed a lot of party stripe and massacre of
Confucian literati. Many confucians retired into their hermit and enjoyed
a rural life. They created river/lake type of Gasa(江湖型歌辭) and
Procrustean type of literature based on Do(載道的 文學觀).
In conclusion, it is needed to classify Gasa according to their characters
into the following two categories: the wise type(顯達型) and the river/lake
type(江湖型). The wise type can be divided into sub-categories such as the
war type, the tour-record type, the moral and motto type, the scenery type,
etc. The river/lake type can be divided into the following sub-categories
such as the hermit type and the loyal type.
KW - social life;family life;procrustean type of literature based
on Do;the classification of Gasa;the wise type;the river/lake type
DO -
UR -
ER -
전일환. (2008). Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa". Korean Language & Literature, 67, 201-223.
전일환. 2008, "Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa"", Korean Language & Literature, no.67, pp.201-223.
전일환 "Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa"" Korean Language & Literature 67 pp.201-223 (2008) : 201.
전일환. Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa". 2008; 67 : 201-223.
전일환. "Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa"" Korean Language & Literature no.67(2008) : 201-223.
전일환. Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa". Korean Language & Literature, 67, 201-223.
전일환. Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa". Korean Language & Literature. 2008; 67 201-223.
전일환. Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa". 2008; 67 : 201-223.
전일환. "Reconsidering Typical Classification of "Gasa"" Korean Language & Literature no.67(2008) : 201-223.