@article{ART002149034},
author={Hee-Kyo Shin},
title={A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'},
journal={Korean Language & Literature},
issn={1229-1730},
year={2016},
number={98},
pages={195-224},
doi={10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195}
TY - JOUR
AU - Hee-Kyo Shin
TI - A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'
JO - Korean Language & Literature
PY - 2016
VL - null
IS - 98
PB - Korean Language & Literature
SP - 195
EP - 224
SN - 1229-1730
AB - Jangsamis'a is Choe Myeongik’s a short story. This work is the work of psychologism affiliation. This work connected to Lee Sang's works. But 'Jangsamisa is different from Lee Sang's works. Meantime a focalization study of Jangsamisa focused on external focalization. But as a stream of consciousness is cross of unconsciousness and consciousness, so focalizer(focalization) aspect of Jangsamisa is 'cross'. Namely there is cross of external focalizer and internal focalizer. In focalization object case, the cross appears, too. The cross unlike change is found in sentence unit.
Meanwhile Jangsamisa shows the characters's ambivalence. A woman's ambivalence is based on a life. But a focalizer's ambivalence is based on an idea. The focalizer's ambivalence is eventually a play of idea or an idea of play.
In this regard Jangsamisa is text of romantic irony.
What is a cause of external focalizer and internal focalizer's cross? That is to say, It is thought that when writer produces text his consciousness is attributable to anxiety. (This anxiety appears focalizer's ambivalence in the text.) That is to say, this anxiety can only be explained by a situation of last stage of Japanese imperialism. Discontinuance of Munjang is proof of that.
The focalizer of Jangsamisa have self-respect. He just shows his thoughts to implied reader(reader). In the situation of last stage of Japanese imperialism, his attitude like this have a meaning of literary history unlike pro-Japanese intellectuals. But his attitude released from life seems a undesirable thing in view of essence of novel genre.
Nevertheless, the life is a life under control of Japanese imperialism. In this regard, focalizer's a play of idea or an idea of play will be reevaluated. That is to say, there was another worthy life-style as this intellectual's own way to protect himself unlike pro-Japanese intellectuals.
KW - Jangsamisa;focalization;focalizer;focalization object;cross;woman's ambivalence;life;focalizer's ambivalence;idea;romantic irony;anxiety;self-respect;novel genre.
DO - 10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
ER -
Hee-Kyo Shin. (2016). A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'. Korean Language & Literature, 98, 195-224.
Hee-Kyo Shin. 2016, "A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'", Korean Language & Literature, no.98, pp.195-224. Available from: doi:10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
Hee-Kyo Shin "A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'" Korean Language & Literature 98 pp.195-224 (2016) : 195.
Hee-Kyo Shin. A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'. 2016; 98 : 195-224. Available from: doi:10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
Hee-Kyo Shin. "A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'" Korean Language & Literature no.98(2016) : 195-224.doi: 10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
Hee-Kyo Shin. A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'. Korean Language & Literature, 98, 195-224. doi: 10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
Hee-Kyo Shin. A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'. Korean Language & Literature. 2016; 98 195-224. doi: 10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
Hee-Kyo Shin. A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'. 2016; 98 : 195-224. Available from: doi:10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195
Hee-Kyo Shin. "A Study on Focalizer of Choe Myeongik’s 'Jangsamisa'" Korean Language & Literature no.98(2016) : 195-224.doi: 10.21793/koreall.2016.98.195