본문 바로가기
  • Home

The characteristics of Records Management Policy during Participation Government(2003~2008)

  • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
  • 2012, (33), pp.113-153
  • Publisher : Korean Society Of Archival Studies
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science

Young Hak LEE 1

1한국외국어대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Since the government of Republic of Korea was established in 1948, a period that made the biggest difference on National Records Management System was from 1999 when <The Law on Records Management in Public Institution> was enacted. Especially, it was the period of President Roh’s five-year tenure called Participation Government (2003-2008). This paper illustrates distinct phenomena of Records Management System Policy during Participation Government. Three major agents of the system are President Roh, the Presidential Secretariat, and Archives Management Bureau at the National Archives of Korea. They sometimes competed with themselves for initiatives of policy, but they used to cooperate with each other and have brought about innovations on records management. The first distinctive characteristic of Participation Government (below PG)’s records management is that it implemented governance actively. That is, it tried to listen carefully to all opinions of interest organizations related to records management and enacted laws based on those. The PG not only listened to civic groups, but also created two professional groups called Records Management Innovation Expert Committee and Innovation Decentralization Assessment Committee. Those two groups enacted <The Road Map of National Records Management Innovation>. Another remarkable feature is a nomination of records management specialists at public institutions. In 2005, PG created Archival Research Positions among research public officials and appointed experts in the field of Archival Research History at central department. With the process, the government tried to provide public records management system and to improve specialty of records management. Since then, records management specialists were employed not only at local governments but also at private archival institutions. It has allowed of entering a new phase in employing records management professionals. The Participation Government also legislated <The Law on Public Records Management> (completely revised) <The Law on Presidential Records Management>. It led to a beginning of developing records management in Republic of Korea. <The Law on Public Records Management> was revised thoroughly for the e-Government period and <The Law on Presidential Archive Management> was established as a foundation for managing presidential records. An establishing process of a country’s records management system describes the degree of democratic development of society. Following governments should supplement PG’s shortcomings and carry out ‘New Governance Records Management System’. Principal subjects of records management system should include not only a government but also civic groups, local governments, small businesses, and academic professionals. The object of records management also needs to be democratic by recording not only the plans and enforcements of a task but also influences and results of a task. The way of archiving ought to be discussed by all related principals.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.