본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Poetics of Artificial Artifacts: Reading Sasha Stiles as an Activist Archivist of Generative Art

  • The Journal of Aesthetics and Science of Art
  • Abbr : JASA
  • 2025, 76(), pp.206~233
  • Publisher : 한국미학예술학회
  • Research Area : Arts and Kinesiology > Other Arts and Kinesiology
  • Received : August 15, 2025
  • Accepted : September 11, 2025
  • Published : October 31, 2025

Ji-Soo Seo 1

1성균관대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Generative poetry, which presupposes artificial intelligence as the subject of creation, has been studied mainly from the perspectives of “authorship,” “literariness,” and “creativity” amid debates over the boundaries between art and non-art. In this context, the generative poems Four Core Texts and Cursive Binary by Sasha Stiles have been interpreted as instances of co-authorship that produce polyphonic voices across “species” by employing AI models as a creative methodology. In these works, “generation” is not confined to a post-human sensibility grounded merely in the interactive writing between humans and non-humans. Rather, “generation” functions as a practical act of excavating and arranging informational units that are sedimented in technological media. Building on this awareness of the issue, this paper examines the archival characteristics of generative poetry as manifested in Four Core Texts and Cursive Binary, focusing on media archaeologist Wolfgang Ernst’s concept of the “archive.” This study understands Stiles’ “poetry writing” as an archival practice and aims to explore its potential as a form of historical writing. In particular, this paper regards “generation” not as subordinate to the category of AI-mediated creative methodology, but as a historian’s genealogical engagement with informational units embedded in the depths of technological media, thus reinterpreting Stiles’ mode of writing not as a site of co-evolution, but as the practice of an archivist.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.