KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002410015},
author={박다래},
title={Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’},
journal={The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China},
issn={1738-0502},
year={2018},
number={50},
pages={3-29},
doi={10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001}

TY - JOUR
AU - 박다래
TI - Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’
JO - The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China
PY - 2018
VL - null
IS - 50
PB - Korean Society of Study on Chinese Languge and Culture
SP - 3
EP - 29
SN - 1738-0502
AB - This study aims to consider mismatch phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’ in Mandarin Chinese, and tries to understand these phenomena based on theories of cognitive grammar and construction grammar. ‘AgentㆍPatient’ is a concept of semantics, and ‘SubjectㆍObject’ is a concept of syntax. But as the integrated research on syntax, semantics, pragmatics advances, there has been a growing tendency to equate agent with subject and patient with object. However, there are many mismatch phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’. Accordingly, many linguists have made many inquiries into these phenomena and tried to explain them in many ways. This study first presented a brief overview of the relation of ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’ and sentences that have mismatch phenomena. In the 1950s, there were controversies about how to give a definition of subject and object. There were two different opinions, one claims that they have to be determined by the syntactic positions (subject-verb-object), the other claims that they have to be determined by their meaning, which means subject has agent meaning, object has patient meaning. Afterward, this study claims that subdivision of theta-role can be useful for solve the problem of mismatch phenomena. Because this can resolve the contradiction between the aforesaid two different opinions and more tangible and obvious theta-role can be assigned to every argument. Lastly, this study explained mismatch phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’ using the terms of ‘Saliency’, ‘Conceptual Blending Theory’, ‘Gestalt’ in the theories of Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar.
KW - Agent;Patient;Theta-role;Gestalt;Saliency;Conceptual Blending Theory
DO - 10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001
ER -

박다래. (2018). Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, 50, 3-29.

박다래. 2018, "Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’", The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, no.50, pp.3-29. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001

박다래 "Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China 50 pp.3-29 (2018) : 3.

박다래. Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’. 2018; 50 : 3-29. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001

박다래. "Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China no.50(2018) : 3-29.doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001

박다래. Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, 50, 3-29. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001

박다래. Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China. 2018; 50 3-29. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001

박다래. Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’. 2018; 50 : 3-29. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001

박다래. "Mismatch Phenomena between ‘AgentㆍPatient’ and ‘SubjectㆍObject’" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China no.50(2018) : 3-29.doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2018..50.001