본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Study about the Relation Analysis of ODA Country Assistance Strategy(CAS) Evaluation Criteria: Through the Content Analysis of CAS Evaluation Report

  • Korean Society and Public Administration
  • Abbr : KSPA
  • 2010, 21(3), pp.325-352
  • Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
  • Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

Park, Byoung-sik 1

1동국대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

To enlarge international prestige, Korea has to increase the amount of assistance to developing countries. KOICA who have distributed international grants from 1991 had implemented the mid-term CAS from 2007 to improve grant programs. In addition, it has appraised the CAS evaluation from 2008 to review the validity of the CAS implementation. This study is to extract the current evaluation criteria for KOICA and ADB and to find what the CAS evaluation criteria consist of. By using Factor Analysis and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, this study analyzes how the evaluation criteria of the two institutions are classified and what the relationship of the evaluation criteria are composed of. As a result of the Independent T-Test analysis, the difference between KOICA and ADB evaluation criteria has found that ADB is considering the criteria of 'Impact' and 'Managing for Results' better than KOICA. Through this study, I can suggest that international evaluation criteria have to be applied not unilaterally but multi-laterally, that the concept of evaluation criteria has to be cleared, and that the evaluation criteria are suggested according to what objects need to be assessed. Also I suggest that the CAS evaluation manual is needed included with the necessary items of evaluation to enable a more systematic and reliable evaluation.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2022 are currently being built.