KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001771573},
author={Bokyung Choi},
title={The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’},
journal={JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES},
issn={1229-3806},
year={2013},
number={40},
pages={1-25},
doi={10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001}

TY - JOUR
AU - Bokyung Choi
TI - The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’
JO - JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES
PY - 2013
VL - null
IS - 40
PB - CHINESE STUDIES INSTITUTE
SP - 1
EP - 25
SN - 1229-3806
AB - This paper aims at explaining Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’. When Zhu Xi was 58 years old, he modified Gao Zi(＜告子＞) chapter of Mencius(≪孟子≫). In the process of modifying it, Zhu Xi’s disciples began to question about ‘Li(理)’ and ‘Qi(氣)’. Because it is likely that ‘Li’ isn’t coherent. First, all existence have the same ‘Li’, but ‘Qi’ is different(理同氣異). Second, ‘Qi’is different, so ‘Li’ also alters(氣異理異). They thought that The two propositions of ‘Li’ and ‘Qi’ are contraction. However, Zhu Xi admitted The two propositions of ‘Li’ and ‘Qi’. Because he thought that two propositions complete each other. The two propositions of ‘Li’ and ‘Qi’ are ontological subject. Through ontological analyzing those, it could be confirmed why Zhu Xi admitted The two propositions of ‘Li’ and ‘Qi’.
KW - Zhu Xi;‘Li(理)’;‘Qi(氣)’;‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’;‘QiyiLiyi (氣異理異)’;Ontology;Supervenience
DO - 10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001
ER -

Bokyung Choi. (2013). The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’. JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES, 40, 1-25.

Bokyung Choi. 2013, "The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’", JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES, no.40, pp.1-25. Available from: doi:10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001

Bokyung Choi "The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’" JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES 40 pp.1-25 (2013) : 1.

Bokyung Choi. The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’. 2013; 40 : 1-25. Available from: doi:10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001

Bokyung Choi. "The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’" JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES no.40(2013) : 1-25.doi: 10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001

Bokyung Choi. The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’. JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES, 40, 1-25. doi: 10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001

Bokyung Choi. The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’. JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES. 2013; 40 1-25. doi: 10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001

Bokyung Choi. The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’. 2013; 40 : 1-25. Available from: doi:10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001

Bokyung Choi. "The ontological analysis of Zhu Xi’s ‘LitongQiyi(理同氣異)’ and ‘QiyiLiyi(氣異理異)’" JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES no.40(2013) : 1-25.doi: 10.26585/chlab.2013..40.001