@article{ART001449381},
author={박경남},
title={The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism},
journal={Journal of Korean Literature},
issn={1598-2076},
year={2010},
number={21},
pages={99-122}
TY - JOUR
AU - 박경남
TI - The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism
JO - Journal of Korean Literature
PY - 2010
VL - null
IS - 21
PB - The Society Of Korean Literature
SP - 99
EP - 122
SN - 1598-2076
AB - This essay is to review Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism, and through that, to devise some specific writing guidelines which is useful to today's composition curriculum. Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協), as a distinguished scholar and a good writer in 17th Joseon Dynasty, criticized an imitative writing custom called Yongsa(用事), and advanced an alternative methods considering prose writing characteristics.
The Yongsa(用事) is a method of conventional composition that quotes or modifies former text in expressions level, for using it, the common writers in the Joseon Dynasty must memorize a great many phrase and sentence in various classics. Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協) thought that the writing based on Yongsa(用事) made a lot of mistake when quote former classical text, and had been attended by evil effects of imitation. So he roundly criticized the imitative writing custom and raised a writing methods which is suitable for the prose itself. He suggested that the prose writer had to learn the method on ‘fixing a central themes’ and ‘arranging paragraphs’, not imitating the expression of it from a great work, especially the Sagi(史記) which had been become a canon in the history of prose writing.
By analyzing his literary criticism about several classical prose work writtin by Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協), I set before each five detailed guidelines on ‘fixing a subject’ and ‘composing paragraphs’ at this essay, and had in place an available guidelines nowaday which is applying the classic literary criticism at the same time.
KW - Kim;Chang-hyup(金昌協);writing method;writing guidelines;fixing a subject;composing paragraphs;the Sagi(史記)
DO -
UR -
ER -
박경남. (2010). The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism. Journal of Korean Literature, 21, 99-122.
박경남. 2010, "The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism", Journal of Korean Literature, no.21, pp.99-122.
박경남 "The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism" Journal of Korean Literature 21 pp.99-122 (2010) : 99.
박경남. The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism. 2010; 21 : 99-122.
박경남. "The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism" Journal of Korean Literature no.21(2010) : 99-122.
박경남. The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism. Journal of Korean Literature, 21, 99-122.
박경남. The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism. Journal of Korean Literature. 2010; 21 99-122.
박경남. The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism. 2010; 21 : 99-122.
박경남. "The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism" Journal of Korean Literature no.21(2010) : 99-122.
