The protection of news contents has become one of the major issues that constantly draw media attention in the world today. The original purpose of legislation for the regualtions of news is the protection of contents against illegal abuse. On the other hand recently legal problems about lawful use of news are increasingly becoming important. This paper will show how can be effectively encouraged the free flow of information through protection of news contents. The results of this paper are summarized as follows:First of all efforts to expand the outreach to newspaper companies need to be continued. So financial support of government for policies aimed at sustaining economic growth of newspaper companies should be driven.
Secondly news contents should be protected as s one of property rights through implementation of “hot news doctrine”.
Thirdly “Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights” system for effective contents protection must be as soon as possible institutionalized.
Forth “Fast Flip” system for reinforcement of cooperation between newspaper and internet portal need to be continuously strengthened.
[journal]
von Bonin, Andreas
/ 1997
/ Internet im Lichte neuer Gesetze
/ ZUM
41
: 821~
[journal]
Bullinger, Martin
/ 2002
/ Vom Urheberrecht zum Rundfunkrecht
/ ZUM
46
: 325~
[journal]
Müller-Hengstenberg, Claus D.
/ 1999
/ Überfordert die IT Technologie die Rechtssysteme?
/ ZUM
43
: 214~
[report]
PWC
/ 2009
/ Moving Into multiple business model: Outlook for newspaper publishing in the Digital age, Strategy Report>
[journal]
Schippan, Martin
/ 2003
/ Urheberrecht goes digital-Das Gesetz zur Regelung des Urheberrechts in der Informationsgesellschaft
/ ZUM
47
: 378~
[journal]
Wagner, Axel-Michael
/ 2004
/ Quo vadis, Urheberrecht?
/ ZUM
48
: 723~
@article{ART001426385}, author={JI Seong Woo}, title={News contents Protection of Press}, journal={Public Land Law Review}, issn={1226-251X}, year={2010}, volume={48}, pages={569-594}
TY - JOUR AU - JI Seong Woo TI - News contents Protection of Press JO - Public Land Law Review PY - 2010 VL - 48 IS - null PB - Korean Public Land Law Association SP - 569 EP - 594 SN - 1226-251X AB - The protection of news contents has become one of the major issues that constantly draw media attention in the world today. The original purpose of legislation for the regualtions of news is the protection of contents against illegal abuse. On the other hand recently legal problems about lawful use of news are increasingly becoming important. This paper will show how can be effectively encouraged the free flow of information through protection of news contents. The results of this paper are summarized as follows:First of all efforts to expand the outreach to newspaper companies need to be continued. So financial support of government for policies aimed at sustaining economic growth of newspaper companies should be driven.
Secondly news contents should be protected as s one of property rights through implementation of “hot news doctrine”.
Thirdly “Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights” system for effective contents protection must be as soon as possible institutionalized.
Forth “Fast Flip” system for reinforcement of cooperation between newspaper and internet portal need to be continuously strengthened. KW - DO - UR - ER -
JI Seong Woo. (2010). News contents Protection of Press. Public Land Law Review, 48, 569-594.
JI Seong Woo. 2010, "News contents Protection of Press", Public Land Law Review, vol.48, pp.569-594.
JI Seong Woo "News contents Protection of Press" Public Land Law Review 48 pp.569-594 (2010) : 569.
JI Seong Woo. News contents Protection of Press. 2010; 48 569-594.
JI Seong Woo. "News contents Protection of Press" Public Land Law Review 48(2010) : 569-594.
JI Seong Woo. News contents Protection of Press. Public Land Law Review, 48, 569-594.
JI Seong Woo. News contents Protection of Press. Public Land Law Review. 2010; 48 569-594.
JI Seong Woo. News contents Protection of Press. 2010; 48 569-594.
JI Seong Woo. "News contents Protection of Press" Public Land Law Review 48(2010) : 569-594.
