KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001530210},
author={나채준},
title={Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea},
journal={Public Land Law Review},
issn={1226-251X},
year={2011},
volume={52},
pages={329-356}

TY - JOUR
AU - 나채준
TI - Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea
JO - Public Land Law Review
PY - 2011
VL - 52
IS - null
PB - Korean Public Land Law Association
SP - 329
EP - 356
SN - 1226-251X
AB - Today, through the development of technology in telecommunications equipment, including telephone and Internet, crimes, especially drug offenses and organized crime is being covertly. Law enforcement agencies such as Police and Prosecutors, was needed scientific investigative methods by wire tapping, monitoring, recording for effective crime prevention. In addition the interception and restrictions of communication and dialogue is control necessary for domestic national security and external national interests. The problem is how to control illegal wiretapping and privacy invasion by abuse of wiretapping. With regard, the recent Constitutional Court has ruled unconstitutional to Communications Privacy Act provisions which did not put a limit on the number of renewal terms. Therefore, discussion about the amendment of Communications Privacy Act is expected to spread. In this paper, overview status of communications interception and relevant wiretapping laws of the United States that it's legal issues has accumulated since the early 1920s Supreme Court precedent. Especially the Federal Communications Act, including advanced congressional legislation, was a great influenced on Korean's Communications Privacy Act. Comparative study of legal issues related to permit requirements for wiretapping and tapping period, an extension of the period were performed. Current Communications Privacy Act and the amendments to be discussed and compared on the legal issues were critically reviewed.
KW - 통신감청(communication interception);유선통신(wire communication);연방통신법(American Telecommunications Act);범죄단속및가두안전종합법(Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act);전기통신 및 프라이버시법(Electronic Communications and Privacy Act);감청통신지원법(Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act);테러대책법(Anti-terrorism legislation);통신비밀보호법(Communications Privacy Act)
DO -
UR -
ER -

나채준. (2011). Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea. Public Land Law Review, 52, 329-356.

나채준. 2011, "Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea", Public Land Law Review, vol.52, pp.329-356.

나채준 "Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea" Public Land Law Review 52 pp.329-356 (2011) : 329.

나채준. Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea. 2011; 52 329-356.

나채준. "Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea" Public Land Law Review 52(2011) : 329-356.

나채준. Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea. Public Land Law Review, 52, 329-356.

나채준. Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea. Public Land Law Review. 2011; 52 329-356.

나채준. Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea. 2011; 52 329-356.

나채준. "Comparative legal study on Communications interception law in the U.S and South Korea" Public Land Law Review 52(2011) : 329-356.