@article{ART002027835},
author={LEE SO DONG},
title={A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese},
journal={The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies },
issn={1598-8503},
year={2015},
number={29},
pages={175-194},
doi={10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008}
TY - JOUR
AU - LEE SO DONG
TI - A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese
JO - The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies
PY - 2015
VL - null
IS - 29
PB - The Society For Chinese Cultural Studies
SP - 175
EP - 194
SN - 1598-8503
AB - 从汉语语法史上看，唐代是语法变化最大的时期。其中，古代汉语的三种指称化标记 ‘所’，‘者’，‘之’统一为‘底’字结构是最大的变化。因此，很多学者对‘底’的来源发表意见，但还 没达成共识。目前为止，‘者’字来源说是被人们最广泛认可的。本文基本上同意‘者’字来源 说，通过考察古汉语三种标记‘所’，‘者’，‘之’在『史記』, 『三國志』, 『世說新語』, 『祖堂集』四部 文献里出现的情况，详细论述了此三种名词化标记的历史发展并统一为‘底’的过程。其具体 情况如下：（1）‘所VP’结构的简单化：从先秦到唐代，‘所VP’结构提取成分和VP类型的绝 大多数是受事和单个动词，并且发生词汇化现象的深化。（2）‘VP者’结构的简单化：从先秦 到唐代，‘VP者’结构提取成分和VP类型的绝大多数是施事、当事和单个动词、形容词。但是 与‘所VP’结构不同，‘VP者’结构里还出现提取受事的和‘VP者NP’，‘N者’等类型，但出现频率 极少。（3）‘NP之VP’结构的消失：到南北朝时，除了几个仿古用例之外，‘NP之VP’结构基 本消失。（4）‘VP底’结构继承‘VP者’结构的次要功能：‘VP底’结构诞生的初期，先继承了 ‘VP者’结构的次要功能，即继承了提取受事‘VP者’和‘VP者NP’，‘N者’等结构。（5）‘VP底’ 结构的功能扩大：随着时间的推移，‘VP底’结构在三个方面上夸大功能：①强化VP者结构的 次要功能②继承并发展VP者结构的主要功能③吸收‘N之N’结构。
KW -
DO - 10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
ER -
LEE SO DONG. (2015). A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , 29, 175-194.
LEE SO DONG. 2015, "A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese", The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , no.29, pp.175-194. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
LEE SO DONG "A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies 29 pp.175-194 (2015) : 175.
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese. 2015; 29 : 175-194. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
LEE SO DONG. "A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies no.29(2015) : 175-194.doi: 10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , 29, 175-194. doi: 10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies . 2015; 29 175-194. doi: 10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese. 2015; 29 : 175-194. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
LEE SO DONG. "A Study on the Unification of Nominalization’s Mark in Ancient Chinese" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies no.29(2015) : 175-194.doi: 10.18212/cccs.2015..29.008
