KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002675971},
author={Park Jooseon},
title={A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person},
journal={The Review of Korean History},
issn={1225-133X},
year={2020},
number={140},
pages={5-44},
doi={10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5}

TY - JOUR
AU - Park Jooseon
TI - A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person
JO - The Review of Korean History
PY - 2020
VL - null
IS - 140
PB - The Historical Society Of Korea
SP - 5
EP - 44
SN - 1225-133X
AB - Nishimoto Masahiro(西本昌弘)’s hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person has been widely accepted in Japanese academia, and some Korean scholars accepted it. To confirm its validity, several issues were reviewed. As a result, it can only be established if all arguments are valid；⑴AD631’s article on Poong-jang’s arrival to Wa had a date error ⑵Gyeong-bok(敬福)’s death article followed the error on Poong-jang’s visit date ⑶Poong-jang and Gyo-gi were King Uija(義慈王)’s son ⑷Seon-gwang(禪廣) = Buyeo Yong(扶餘勇) = Sae-sang(塞上) ⑸Poong-jang = Gyu-hae(糺解) = Gyo-gi ⑹Gyo-gi’s arrival to Wa was AD643 ⑺A news of political change in Baekje(百濟) was false, so Gyo-gi was a leader of formal envoy. However, criticism of each is persuasive, above issues are closely connected to each other, and if one collapses, it may collapse in a chain reaction. So the hypothesis is difficult to establish. In particular, Nishimoto presented multiple other same person theories, to prove ‘Poong-jang = Gyo-gi’, however if ‘Seon-gwang = Buyeo Yong’ is not convincing, it cannot even be introduced. But, traces of Seon-gwang and Buyeo Yong before and after the fall of Baekje indicated that they were different persons. Therefore, basis of it is extremely precarious. Examining Nishimoto’s other papers on Baekje-Wa relation together, it can be found that he recognized ‘Tax of Imna(任那調)’ and ‘Reconstructing Imna(任那復興)’ as the historical facts. Based on ‘Poong-jang = Gyo-gi’, he said when Baekje occupied the former Gaya region in AD642, Wa who has claimed dominium of Imna demanded the dispatch of a prince, then Baekje sent Poong-jang(= Gyo-gi), the son of King Uija, to Wa in AD643. Given this, it remains the impression he interpreted the above issues in line with his opinion. In short, 'Poong-jang = Gyo-gi’ has clear limits in the attitude and perspective of handling with historical materials. Although ‘Poong-jang = Gyo-gi’ is attractive, it is necessary to pay attention to the process from which this view was derived. In this paper, Poong-jang and Gyo-gi are understood as different persons, and Poong-jang was a formal envoy sent to Wa by his father King Uija in AD631, and Gyo-gi was a nephew of King Uija and expelled by political change in AD642.
KW - Poong-jang(豊璋);Gyo-gi(翹岐);Seon-gwang(禪廣);hypothesis that same person
DO - 10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5
ER -

Park Jooseon. (2020). A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person. The Review of Korean History, 140, 5-44.

Park Jooseon. 2020, "A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person", The Review of Korean History, no.140, pp.5-44. Available from: doi:10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5

Park Jooseon "A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person" The Review of Korean History 140 pp.5-44 (2020) : 5.

Park Jooseon. A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person. 2020; 140 : 5-44. Available from: doi:10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5

Park Jooseon. "A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person" The Review of Korean History no.140(2020) : 5-44.doi: 10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5

Park Jooseon. A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person. The Review of Korean History, 140, 5-44. doi: 10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5

Park Jooseon. A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person. The Review of Korean History. 2020; 140 5-44. doi: 10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5

Park Jooseon. A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person. 2020; 140 : 5-44. Available from: doi:10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5

Park Jooseon. "A review on the hypothesis that Poong-jang(豊璋) and Gyo-gi(翹岐) are same person" The Review of Korean History no.140(2020) : 5-44.doi: 10.31218/TRKH.2020.12.140.5