본문 바로가기
  • Home

Which Naturalism?: The Problem of the ‘Natural’ in Korean Art History

  • The Journal of Aesthetics and Science of Art
  • Abbr : JASA
  • 2026, 78(), pp.118~143
  • Publisher : 한국미학예술학회
  • Research Area : Arts and Kinesiology > Other Arts and Kinesiology
  • Received : April 15, 2026
  • Accepted : June 3, 2026
  • Published : June 30, 2026

Ji-Min Son 1

1단국대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This paper takes as its point of departure a pressing scholarly problem concerning Korean aesthetics and the arts, as they have been addressed across art history, folklore studies, literature, and philosophy. The issues related to this problem unmistakably converge around the concept of the ‘natural’ and ‘naturalism.’ Korean aesthetics is typically identified primarily with a particular set of Neo-Confucian or Buddhist concepts forming practical and naturalistic doctrines, or, in some cases, reduced to the appearance of ‘natural’ or unsophisticated artifacts. But as it has also been noticeable in scholarship, the little space that remains for articulating a distinctive cultural identity grounded in a coherent notion dwindles even further. What is now required from scholarship is to naturalize questions regarding the traditional, religious significance attributed in the fecundity (rather than the specificity or uniqueness) of accounts of aesthetic experiences, artifacts and their production through cross-cultural, interdisciplinary methods.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.