본문 바로가기
  • Home

An investigation of syntactic features of the structures A+(de)+V and V+(de)+A in modern Chinese Language

  • The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China
  • Abbr : JSLCKC
  • 2008, (15), pp.189-208
  • DOI : 10.16874/jslckc.2008..15.010
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Study on Chinese Languge and Culture
  • Research Area : Humanities > Chinese Language and Literature
  • Published : February 28, 2008

LEE EUN KYOUNG 1

1한국외국어대학교

Candidate

ABSTRACT

This paper discussed the syntactic difference of the adjective used as an adverbial or complement in a sentence. The contrastive features of the using of the structures A+(de)+V and V+de+A are followings: The NP could be used after A+(de)+V quite freely, and sometimes the NP could be the prerequisite for the using of A+(de)+V, whereas the NP is seldom used after V+A, and the NP could not be used after V+de+A. The particle “zhe” could be used after A+de+V in which A is a single syllable adjective, and the particle “le” could not be used after it, whereas The particle “le” could be used after V+A in which A is a single syllable adjective, and the particle “zhe” could not be used after it. A+(de)+V could be used in the structure of “zai……(zhe)(ne)” with a present progressive tense, whereas V+A and V+de+A could not be used in it. A+V could be used in a LIANDONG sentence or a pivotal sentence, and V+de+A could not be used in a LIANDONG sentence, whereas A+V could not be used as an adverbial, and V+de+A could. A+(de)+V could be used as an object of some verbs “jueding”,”yuanyi”,”dasuan”,etc, whereas V+de+A could be used as an object of some verbs “renwei”,”yiwei”,”jinxing”,etc. A+(de)+V could be seldom used as a modifier, whereas V+de+A couldc be often used as a modifier.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2022 are currently being built.