KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002158181},
author={AN CHANSOON},
title={The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈)},
journal={The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China},
issn={1738-0502},
year={2016},
number={42},
pages={331-356},
doi={10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013}

TY - JOUR
AU - AN CHANSOON
TI - The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈)
JO - The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China
PY - 2016
VL - null
IS - 42
PB - Korean Society of Study on Chinese Languge and Culture
SP - 331
EP - 356
SN - 1738-0502
AB - Zhu Xi(朱熹)，a well-known moralist and litterateur of Chinese academic history, was extremely interested in literature. Therefore, he was active in literary creation as a professional writer, and always expressed his literary opinion in his works, which include evaluation about other litterateurs. As for his literary opinion, the evaluation of Han Yu(韓愈) (Tang Dynasty) attracts our attention mostly, since this persons was influential in Chinese literature history. It was necessary for Zhu Xi(朱熹) to evaluate him firstly because his opinion stood opposite against Neo-Confucianism，which was came up with by Zhu Xi(朱熹). However, because of the limitation of his status and argument, he evaluated Han Yu(韓愈) differently, which made an acute academic debate about the reason why this difference appeared among the later litterateur generation. Some people think that，as time went by，Zhu Xi(朱熹) changed part of his opinion,so he gave different evaluation. But other people disagree with that. Through this article, the author argues that the reason why this difference appeared is mainly because the distinguished status of moralist and litterateur. As mentioned above, Zhu Xi(朱熹) was a moralist but also a litterateur, which are supposed to be 2 opposite statuses. Therefore, there are some contradiction in his mind originally, which made this difference.
KW - Zhu Xi;Han Yu;moralist;litterateur;Neo-Confucianism
DO - 10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013
ER -

AN CHANSOON. (2016). The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈). The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, 42, 331-356.

AN CHANSOON. 2016, "The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈)", The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, no.42, pp.331-356. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013

AN CHANSOON "The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈)" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China 42 pp.331-356 (2016) : 331.

AN CHANSOON. The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈). 2016; 42 : 331-356. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013

AN CHANSOON. "The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈)" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China no.42(2016) : 331-356.doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013

AN CHANSOON. The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈). The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, 42, 331-356. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013

AN CHANSOON. The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈). The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China. 2016; 42 331-356. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013

AN CHANSOON. The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈). 2016; 42 : 331-356. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013

AN CHANSOON. "The literary viewpoint and significance of Zhu Xi(朱熹), were presented through his evaluation about Han Yu(韓愈)" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China no.42(2016) : 331-356.doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2016..42.013