본문 바로가기
  • Home

A Comparative Study on the Constructivism and the Structuralism as the Educational Methods

  • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
  • Abbr : JKLISS
  • 2009, 40(4), pp.81-92
  • DOI : 10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.81
  • Publisher : Korean Library And Information Science Society
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science

Jinwon Suh 1

1전북대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

I studied in this paper on the comparative study between the constructivism and the structuralism as the educational methods. On the constructivism in educational methods they say that knowledge is constructed subjectively by person individually(cognitive constructivism) or by persons reciprocally in the society(social constructivism). On the structuralism in educational methods they say that knowledge(structure) is in the closed-end text objectively and person pursue and identify this objective knowledge in the closed-end text. But on the post-structuralism(neostructuralism) they say that the text is not closed-ended but open-ended. So constructivism is consistent with post-structuralism. Education include application of knowledge and awareness of knowledge on my opinion. Education on application of knowledge is more important in this knowledge based society. Constructivism connote the application of knowledge in the education. School library media center and media specialist(teather-librarian) are essential elements of this application of knowledge in the education.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.