본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Karma of Power: The“Both Sides” of Machiavellian Exemplarity in The Prince and the Paradox of Agambenian Sovereignty

Bomin Kim 1

1서울대학교 인문대학 영어영문학과

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study offers an Agambenian interpretation of Machiavelli’s use ofhistorical examples in The Prince. I show how, even as Machiavelli insistson the impunity with which the prince can and should transgress traditionalnorms of political action for the sake of his personal safety and thestability of the body politic, his historical examples, initially appearingfragmentarily for illustrative purposes, gradually snowball into stories ofthe fall, as well as the rise, of princes. If the prince can rule on himselfas being exceptional to conventional ethical and moral parameters of statecraft,he can, in turn, also be ruled as exceptional to the safeguards afforded by traditional moralities. Without being explicit about it,Machiavelli effectively anticipates the paradoxical duality of sovereign exceptionality,famously conceptualized by Giorgio Agamben, according towhich the necessary correlative to the prince’s capacity to create homosacer is his suppressed identity as another homo sacer. The duality ironicallyopens up the possibility that Machiavelli’s own discourse with itsemphasis on serving the current ruler of the state can indiscriminatelyserve the illegitimate, as well as the legitimate, ruler and even would-beusurpers. It is this consciousness of the paradoxical nature of his own discoursethat motivates Machiavelli’s insistence on martial virtuosity as theonly princely virtue, his categorical distinction between princely virtù andthe subject’s virtue, and his call to Lorenzo Medici to bring order to Italyin a state of primordial chaos.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.