@article{ART002593816},
author={Jimin Son},
title={Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty},
journal={Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University},
issn={1598-3021},
year={2020},
volume={77},
number={2},
pages={435-470},
doi={10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jimin Son
TI - Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty
JO - Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University
PY - 2020
VL - 77
IS - 2
PB - Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University
SP - 435
EP - 470
SN - 1598-3021
AB - The name “Mono-ha” was given at the beginning of the 1970s by demeaning critics to the Japanese artists who formed a loose constellation around the theory of Mono, the latter term designating a specific understanding of the being of an immediate, literal thing or object. Their working method, expounded predominantly by Lee Ufan and Kishio Suga through texts and works, became a fast-spreading phenomenon in the Japanese and international art world. While most of these artists continue to work and exhibit independently to this day, the necessary philosophical research on the sole artistic motive of the constellation, namely the theory of Mono, remains largely insufficient. To address this issue, this article focuses on the role played by the phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty to which Lee turned to clarify the above method shared commonly by the artists. Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of perception not only brings to the fore the process by which the artists’ inquiry into Mono develops into their individual method, but also renders possible an ontology of Mono at the very core of their practice and philosophy.
KW - Mono;Mono-ha;Lee Ufan;Kishio Suga;Nobuo Sekine;Phenomenology;Maurice Merleau-Ponty
DO - 10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
ER -
Jimin Son. (2020). Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 77(2), 435-470.
Jimin Son. 2020, "Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty", Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, vol.77, no.2 pp.435-470. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
Jimin Son "Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 77.2 pp.435-470 (2020) : 435.
Jimin Son. Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty. 2020; 77(2), 435-470. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
Jimin Son. "Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 77, no.2 (2020) : 435-470.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
Jimin Son. Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 77(2), 435-470. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
Jimin Son. Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University. 2020; 77(2) 435-470. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
Jimin Son. Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty. 2020; 77(2), 435-470. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435
Jimin Son. "Can the Methods of Mono-ha (もの派) Realize the Being of Mono (もの) as a Work of Art?: Via the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 77, no.2 (2020) : 435-470.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.77.2.202005.435