@article{ART000938409},
author={薛桂景},
title={The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit},
journal={Public Land Law Review},
issn={1226-251X},
year={2004},
volume={24},
pages={213-230}
TY - JOUR
AU - 薛桂景
TI - The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit
JO - Public Land Law Review
PY - 2004
VL - 24
IS - null
PB - Korean Public Land Law Association
SP - 213
EP - 230
SN - 1226-251X
AB - This dissertation is contents about the protection description theory and the third party’ suit in administration suit law. The public right was not much given to the individual in the past and so although right and benefit were invaded to individual, they were only reflexive benefit. But today the individual public right is being extended due to the extension of public right, and also the matter of the third party’s benefit protection is being extended.This dissertation deals with specially the third party’s plaintiff legitimacy in administration suit law. That is, the first chapter deals with the individual public right and protection prescription, the second chapter does the protection prescription for the third party and the protection matter of basic right, the third chapter does the plaintiff legitimacy in administration suit law, the fourth does the extension tendency of benefit in law, finally the fifth chapter does the conclusion.In short, today specially in the fields of construction law, environment law, and economy law the approval and license act of administration office functions as the act that affects the third party. The act that affect the direct party appear as disadvantagious legal effect to neighbor and competition party in harm and benefit disposal of the approval and license. That is a problem. For this, although the third party’suit appears as a problem, it is not easy for us to find the explicit regulation protecting the third party’s benefit in the related law. Accordingly, like Germany, our country has to try to make efforts to compensate for these defects through the direct adoption of the constitution’s the basic articles or the order theories for third party consideration in the case that the protections are demanded constitutionally.
KW -
DO -
UR -
ER -
薛桂景. (2004). The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit. Public Land Law Review, 24, 213-230.
薛桂景. 2004, "The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit", Public Land Law Review, vol.24, pp.213-230.
薛桂景 "The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit" Public Land Law Review 24 pp.213-230 (2004) : 213.
薛桂景. The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit. 2004; 24 213-230.
薛桂景. "The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit" Public Land Law Review 24(2004) : 213-230.
薛桂景. The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit. Public Land Law Review, 24, 213-230.
薛桂景. The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit. Public Land Law Review. 2004; 24 213-230.
薛桂景. The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit. 2004; 24 213-230.
薛桂景. "The protection prescription theory in administrationsuit law and the third party’suit" Public Land Law Review 24(2004) : 213-230.
