본문 바로가기
  • Home

Legal Character of Administrative Notice

  • Public Land Law Review
  • Abbr : KPLLR
  • 2009, 43(2), pp.287-316
  • Publisher : Korean Public Land Law Association
  • Research Area : Social Science > Law

Chi Hwan Kim 1

1영산대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This is a critical note about whether an administrative notice can be the object of revocation suit in the administrative court or not. Under the present Administrative Litigation Act, the object of revocation suit should be an administrative act which is exercised by public power and has forcible effects to enforce peoples to follow. According to this provision, it is impossible for us to suit the administrative notice. Because notice is not the forcible administrative act but just an act to notify someone of something. Nothing is changed by the notice. On the contrary, forcible administrative act is to limit our right or bound us to do something. In the case I have analyzed in this note, the court dealt with the notice as an administrative act. I agree with the conclusion of the judgement but have a different way of thinking from the reasons of the judgement. I don't think of notice as a forcible act. I think the notice is just a notice and has no power to change people's rights or duties. I maintain that the court should judge the case, not on the ground that it is a forcible act but there are no objects but the notice to relieve their rights. In my opinion, the judicial understanding on the object of administrative suit henceforth should be changed.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.