본문 바로가기
  • Home

A Comparative Study of Capital-Centered Spatial Politics in Authoritarian Regimes: The Cases of Ashgabat, Nur-Sultan (Astana), and Pyongyang

  • Asia Review
  • Abbr : SNUACAR
  • 2026, 16(1), pp.267~306
  • Publisher : 아시아연구소
  • Research Area : Social Science > Social Science in general
  • Received : February 15, 2026
  • Accepted : March 31, 2026
  • Published : April 30, 2026

HAN JEE MAN 1 Kang Sung Chul 1 YeChan Moon 2

1숭실대학교 숭실평화통일연구원
2연세대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study examines the capital-centered spatial politics of Kim Jong Un’s regime in North Korea after the Eighth Party Congress in 2021 through a comparative authoritarianism framework, focusing on the cases of Turkmenistan (1991–2025) and Kazakhstan (1997–2019), both of which pursued analogous policies during specific historical periods. In each case, the state forcefully promoted capital-centered spatial politics with the aim of consolidating the supreme leader’s authority and intensifying the cult of personality. By comparatively analyzing Ashgabat in Turkmenistan, Nur-Sultan (currently Astana) in Kazakhstan, and Pyongyang in North Korea, this article explores the ways in which authoritarian regimes strengthen social control through spatial politics. It does so by applying Gerschewski’s tripartite framework of legitimation, repression, and co-optation, and by empirically testing the argument through GIS-based spatial measurement data.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.