@article{ART001567317},
author={杨贵环},
title={The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou},
journal={The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China},
issn={1738-0502},
year={2011},
number={26},
pages={103-127},
doi={10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006}
TY - JOUR
AU - 杨贵环
TI - The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou
JO - The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China
PY - 2011
VL - null
IS - 26
PB - Korean Society of Study on Chinese Languge and Culture
SP - 103
EP - 127
SN - 1738-0502
AB - As a master of poetic theory in Ming Dynasty, Hu Yinglin’s ShiSou criticizes on Caozhi’s poem are typical. So in the article, statistical method is used to study it thoroughly, and also others researchers’ comments on Caozhi’s poem are also compared with Hu’s deeply. The main point of Hu’s Criticism on Caozhi’s poem could be summarized as several ones. One is advocation of BenSe’s distinctions; and he thinks that pattern of poem changes with dynasty, and also poetic style descends along with dynasties. Also he values the revivalist poetry. Hu Yinglin highly confirms Caozhi’s poetry on their style, and at the same time, he thinks that poem in Han dynasty are natural while artificial in Wei, including Caozhi’s poetry. To summarize, Hu and his contemporaneous poets’ distinguishing critics on Caozhi’s poem reflect the specialty in Ming Dynasty.
KW - Ming Dynasty;Hu Yinglin;ShiSou;Caozhi’s poem;literature Cirtics
DO - 10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
ER -
杨贵环. (2011). The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, 26, 103-127.
杨贵环. 2011, "The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou", The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, no.26, pp.103-127. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
杨贵环 "The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China 26 pp.103-127 (2011) : 103.
杨贵环. The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou. 2011; 26 : 103-127. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
杨贵环. "The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China no.26(2011) : 103-127.doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
杨贵环. The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China, 26, 103-127. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
杨贵环. The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China. 2011; 26 103-127. doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
杨贵环. The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou. 2011; 26 : 103-127. Available from: doi:10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006
杨贵环. "The critics to Caozhi’s Poem in Ming Dynasty :Focus on Hu Yinglin’s Shi Sou" The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China no.26(2011) : 103-127.doi: 10.16874/jslckc.2011..26.006