Freelisting: A New Research Method (새로운 조사방법에 대한 연구- 프리리스팅(Freelisting)을 중심으로 -)

Shim, Jae-Myung (심재명)

Freelisting: A New Research Method

Journal of Tourism Sciences
Abbr : JTS
2011, 35(1), pp.33-51
Publisher : The Tourism Sciences Society Of Korea
Research Area : Social Science > Tourism

Shim, Jae-Myung ¹

¹동국대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Freelisting has been developed in the field of cognitive anthropology, a subfield of cultural anthropology, and as a new information eliciting technique. Freelisting is based on the notion of culture as a shared information among the members constituting a common culture. The purpose of freelisting method is twofold: first, it determines the content of a cultural domain, and secondly it infers the internal structure of the domain(i.e., the relative salience of the content items). ANTHROPAC is usually used for freelisting analysis, which produces such measures as frequency, rank order, and Salience Index of each freelisted item. Freelisting has merits in terms of its simplicity in execution and yet its sound conceptual underpinning. Provided such merits, freelisting seems to be a useful research tool that can be applied in the study of tourism and tourism related matters as well.

KEYWORDS

Freelisting, Cultural domain, ANTHROPAC, Salience index

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 김사헌 / 2008 / Beyond Our Secular Identity:Retrospect and Challenges for Korean Tourism Studies / 관광학연구 / 한국관광학회 32(4) : 11~33

[journal] 오익근 / 2006 / Application of Focus Group Interview to Tourism Research / 관광학연구 / 한국관광학회 30(1) : 433~439

[thesis] 최광환 / 2008 / 한국지역축제 핵심성공요인(CSF)의 측정변수 개발에 관한 연구 / 박사 / 동국대학교

[book] Babbie, E / 1989 / The Practice of Social Research / A Division of Wadsworth, Inc

[book] Borgatti, S. P / 1996 / ANTHROPAC 4.0 Methods Guide / Analytic Technologies

[book] Borgatti, S. P / 1999 / Elicitation techniuqes for cultural domain analysis. In Enhanced ethnographic methods: The ethnographer's toolkit, 3 / AltaMira : 115~151

[web] Cash, J / 1998 / Cognitive Anthropology / http://www.indiana.edu/~wanthro /cog.htm.

[book] Caukins, D / 1998 / Consensus analysis: Do Scottish business advisers agree on models of success? In Using Methods in the Field: A Practical Introduction and Casebook / Altamira Press : 179~195

[book] Chen, P. Y / 2004 / Interrater agreement. In The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods / Sage : 511~513

[journal] Chick, G / 2000 / Editorial: Opportunities for cross-cultural comparative research on leisure / Leisure Sciences 22 : 79~91

[book] Dillman, D. A / 1999 / Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method / John Wiley & Sons

[book] Dressler, W. W / 2004 / Cognitive anthropology. In The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods / Sage : 139~140

[book] Flinn, J / 1998 / Freelists, ratings, averages, and frequencies: Why so few students study anthropology. In Using Methods in the Field: A Practical Introduction and Casebook / Altamira Press : 85~96

[book] Fleisher, M. S / 1998 / Freelisting: Managemenet at a women’s federal prison camp. In Using Methods in the Field: A Practical Introduction and Casebook / Altamira Press : 69~84

[journal] Guest, G / 2007 / How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability / Field Methods 18 : 59~82

[journal] Quinlan, M / 2005 / Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: Examples from ethobotany / Field Methods 17 : 219~234

[book] Roberts, J. M / 1964 / The self-management of cultures. In Explorations in Cultural Anthropology / McGraw-Hill : 433~454

[web] Robertson, T / Cognitive Anthropology / http://www.as.u a.edu/ ant/Faculty/murphy/436/coganth.htm

[journal] Sutrop, U / 2001 / List task and a cognitive salience index / Field Methods 13 : 263~276

[book] Tribe, J. / 2007 / A review of tourism research. In Developments in Tourism Research / Elsevier : 3~14

[book] Weller, S. C / 1988 / Systematic Data Collection / Sage

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of Tourism Sciences 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 2.7