The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the descriptions of two kinds of learning comics, "Honggildongjeon," published in 30th edition of the Gyeongpan and "The Story of Our High School" in the '90s. Since liberation, "Honggildongjeon" has been constantly reproduced in various versions for students, a work familiar to many people. As "Color Science Learning Cartoon," published by Kumsung Publishing Co. in 1976, became recognized for its educational value, learning cartoons based on Korean classics began to be published since the 1990s. With the full-fledged emergence of "classic cartoons for learning" for elementary, middle and high school students, the difficult classics were embodied interestingly and interestingly. In the meantime, comics have been discussed as an auxiliary means of the curriculum. In addition, the study focused on the value of Chinese classics "Three Kingdoms" and "Seo Yu-gi" as contents that are converted into cartoons, PC games, animations and dramas. However, research on how learning comics are related to nuclear power plants, how they are transformed, what is the focus of cartoons, and the narrative changes based on the reinterpretation of classics is insufficient. Therefore, the main school wanted to exclude the problem of stylistic characteristics between novels and cartoons, and focus on the narrative change of how faithfully the narrative of the nuclear power plant "Honggildongjeon" was reflected in the learning cartoon "Honggildongjeon." It was intended to discuss the descriptions of the 30th issue of <Honggil-dongjeon>, 1. preface, 2. birth and run away; 3. activities of active binsang; 4. construction of an ideal country; 5. 1 omission of the contents of the nuclear history; 2) additional explanation of the contents of the nuclear history; 3) transformation of the contents of the nuclear power plant history; 4) agreement.