2021, Vol., No.36

PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.5

pISSN : 1975-1621 / eISSN : 2092-0873
https://journal.kci.go.kr/insewtdgu

This paper aims to revisit Karl Popper's Logik der Forschung, first published in 1935, and critically reconstruct Popper's interpretation of quantum mechanics based on it. Above all, we examine whether Popper's propensity interpretation of probability can extend to a fundamental interpretation that properly account for quantum mechanics, rather than just an alternative interpretation of probabilities. Based on this, we discuss the concept of quantum propensity. Furthermore, it examines whether Popper's tendency can be an ontological basis across natural philosophical reasons. We discussed the implications of Zhang Hwe Ik's natural philosophy and his new interpretation of the quantum mechanical state as a propensity to cause events. on these problems. This study aims to critically reconstruct Popper's interpretation of quantum mechanics by reviewing Karl Popper's Logik der Forschung, first published in 1935. Above all, it examines whether the propensity interpretation of probability proposed by Popper can be developed into a new fundamental interpretation of quantum mechanics. Based on this, the concept of quantum propensity is discussed. Furthermore, it examines whether the propensity can be an ontological basis in Popper's overall natural philosophical thinking. In this course, the relationship to Zhang Hwe Ik's natural philosophy will be discussed. In particular, it examines the meaning of the approach to interpreting the state of quantum mechanics as 'propensity to cause events'.

This paper aims to distinguish Marx's materialistic dialectic from Hegel's speculative dialectic and to show its characteristics in relation to Hegel's. Considering the well-known understanding of their different perspectives, namely, materialism and idealism, it provides an explanation that Hegel's dialectic can be formulated as speculative on the basis of self-related negativity(Negativität) whereas Marx's dialectic as materialistic established on the sensory practice of 'real, active men'. This also leads to the difference of the concept of negation in both ways. Based on Marx's Economic Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, in which his critical study on german speculative dialectic appears in the most concrete way, this paper discuss the significance of the concept of negation as follows: 1. The comparison presents that Marx developed Hegel’s concept of negativity in radical way from a materialistic perspective and points out to which extent Marx successes the dialectical method of Hegel and where he stops depending on german idealistic tradition. 2. In dialectic, Marx sees the capacity of negation for scientific analysis and criticism in order to seek the possibility of the internal dissolution of the existing capitalistic system. Despite the potential of dialectic it self, the hegelian method is equivalent to bourgeois economic theories in terms of blindly approving capitalistic premises.

Today, we understand how dangerous the disgust is. Because the disgust is an emotion that can cause or promote the various social discrimination and even lead to the hate crime. Nevertheless, to solve the problem of the disgust is not an easy task. We have heard of a lot of social campaigns about the dangers of disgust, but the disgusting acts do not cease. This is because, above all, the disgust is both a social act and a natural psychological phenomenon of an individual. Moreover, there seems to be a kind of positive function in the disgust. We could call it the duplicity of the disgust. This article focuses on the complexity of the disgust problem from the perspective of the duplicity of disgust, and analyzes the phenomenon of the disgust from a phenomenological point of view, and seeks the direction of problem solving by elucidating the correlations with the emotions, such as anxiety, especially related to the disgust. To this end, we will use not a linear causal analysis, but a motive relationship analysis and E. Husserl’s an phenomenological analysis of the Fundierung relationship.