2017, Vol.46, No.

This study analyzed how an aspect of translation can be shown on the ‘Kureru type(くれる類)’ verbs in 『Kokoro』, which was a Japanese modern novel when it was reproduced by translators. It focused on ‘the use in accordance with a subject of expression and the other person’ and ‘the object of movement’. ‘The use in accordance with a subject of expression and the other person’ could be summarized as follows: The ‘Kureru type’ verbs were not translated only in accordance with the use of vocabulary in a dictionary. ‘Kudasaru’ was used in many examples of letter writing when ‘the giver’ was younger and it was translated to a polite form in Korean. ‘Kureru’ had a characteristic when ‘the giver’ was older in Korean translation. The act of parents was translated to an honorific form if parents were ‘givers’ regardless of whether a listener was an internal character or an external character in parent-child relationships. The degree of politeness was different in English translation when the ‘Kureru type’ verbs were used for asking a favor･request･command. ‘Please’ was used more for ‘Kudasaru’ than ‘Kureru’. An aspect of translation in accordance with ‘the object of movement’ could be summarized as follows: The ‘Kureru type’ verbs were used as main verbs. ‘Kureru’ and ‘Kudasaru’ were translated to ‘Juda’ ‘Jusida’ in Korean translation, but they were translated to various vocabulary words in accordance with the characteristic of ‘the object of movement’ and were translated to imply a specific act, the process of possession and the result of possession in English translation. The ‘Kureru type’ verbs were also used as auxiliary verbs. The translated vocabulary words for Korean translation and English translation were different in accordance with whether the movement of things other than the movement of act was included or not. Examples were translated predominantly to expressions of profit such as ‘-Jada’ ‘-Dalla’ ‘-Jusida’ when there was a movement of act as well as specific things in Korean translation. Also, some examples were translated to expressions of profit when there was the movement of act with an abstract matter and there was only the act of the object of movement, but many examples were translated to the act of first verbs. Examples were translated predominantly to the act of first verbs when there was the movement which included specific things and abstract matters or there was only the movement of act in English translation. Expressions of asking a favor･request such as ‘Kureru’ and ‘Kudasaru’ were translated to ‘-Dalla’ ‘-Juseyo’ in Korean translation, but they were translated to expressions which specify an act while focusing on the structure of sentences or the function of language, such as ‘must’, ‘ask’, ‘wish’, ‘would’, and ‘would like to’ ‘please’ in English translation.

A Comparative Study of Case Markers in Korean, Japanese and Ryukyuan Languages: Focusing on Nominative Case Markers and Accusative Case Markers

Li, Jia | 2017, 46 | pp.355~377 | number of Cited : 1

PDF

“The Burning of Hospitals”: Sade's Thoughts on Hospitals from the Ancien Regime to the End of the 18 th Century

Lee Choong Hoon | 2017, 46 | pp.379~409 | number of Cited : 1

PDF

Ngugi wa Thiong'o's Cultural Theory and Its Significance in Translation

Lee, Hyoseok | 2017, 46 | pp.411~434 | number of Cited : 0

PDF

The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’

Gong JianZe , Jun SungKon | 2017, 46 | pp.435~463 | number of Cited : 0

PDF

This paper aims to identify the structural characteristics of Okawa Syumei(大川周明), Wakamiya Unosuke(若宮卯之助) and Okakura Tensin(岡倉天心). In fact, after Okawa Syumei studied the Principles of Wakamiya Unosuke and Okakura Tensin, he derived a conclusion and wrote a book named "yeolseongjeon". This book talks about the emperor dynasty. Based on this, the theory presented by Wakamiya Unosuke and Okakura Tensin described the characteristics of the East European culture. Okakura Tensin crossed the western part and discovered that western culture is only western culture and not a universal culture. Western culture has developed from its own experience. Wakamiya Unosuke translated a book by William Knox, The spirt of the orient. They have the same point of view, but they have a different culture and they must follow their own culture. Okakura Tensin insisted that culture is dynamic and it improves by adapting different cultures of different countries. Wakamiya appealed and he opposed Tensin's studies about culture. Wakamiya's definition of culture has not changed or is fixed from the past, which still exists in the modern times. Culture must be cultivated and it must be introduced to people who have forgotten their own culture. Despite such methodological differences, the commonality between Okakura and Wakamiya is that Western civilization is nothing more than a regional culture, as the West is not a universal civilization, but as a whole, it is a regional culture. Okawa Syumei learned the Okakura and Wakamiya's theory about culture and derived a conclusion. He stated that both opinions are correct as culture can be adapted as explained by Okakura. For example, Japanese people are now adapting and embracing the culture of Chinese people and Indian people. On the other hand, he also learned Wakamiya Unosuke’s theory that culture does not change. Japanese have their own culture that was created in the past or it was developed by their ancestors; for example, the emperor dynasty. Okawa Syumei learned different cultures of different countries and Japanese people are adapting those cultures, and Wakamiya stated that the emperor dynasty must be instilled and it must be universal. Japanese emperors have different cultures, especially the Meiji emperor who is willing to accept different cultures of different countries. Finally, he claimed that the emperor dynasty created a new Japanese civilization and they are now embracing the new adapted culture.

‘Time’ in French Cultural Education

Jung Woohyang | 2017, 46 | pp.465~495 | number of Cited : 0

PDF

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Cross-Cultural Studies 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.52

2017, Vol.46, No.