KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART003027179},
author={sun-ju kim},
title={Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity},
journal={The Journal of Translation Studies},
issn={1229-795X},
year={2023},
volume={24},
number={4},
pages={233-266},
doi={10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008}

TY - JOUR
AU - sun-ju kim
TI - Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity
JO - The Journal of Translation Studies
PY - 2023
VL - 24
IS - 4
PB - The Korean Association for Translation Studies
SP - 233
EP - 266
SN - 1229-795X
AB - This study aims to gain an integrated perspective on perceptions by learners and instructors toward feedback methods in translation studies training provided at graduate schools of translation and interpreting, and to explore their application in translation training. To realize these goals, the study presents the following research questions. (1) What feedback methods do teachers at graduate schools of translation and interpreting provide during translation classes? (2) What factors have an impact on how instructors provide feedback methods during translation classes? (3) How do learners react to different method of feedback provided during translation classes in the BA direction? (4) What common factors and differences exist between instructors and learners’ perceptions regarding the feedback methods being provided? Based on analysis results, the following conclusions can be reached. First, learners recognize the benefits of indirect feedback but prefer direct feedback. Second, interactive feedback is necessary between instructors and learners. Third, learners have a high level of acceptance for mid-term assessment feedback and process-oriented feedback.
KW - direct feedback;process-oriented feedback;mid-term assessment feedback;one-on-one conferences feedback;positive feedback
DO - 10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008
ER -

sun-ju kim. (2023). Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity. The Journal of Translation Studies, 24(4), 233-266.

sun-ju kim. 2023, "Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity", The Journal of Translation Studies, vol.24, no.4 pp.233-266. Available from: doi:10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008

sun-ju kim "Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity" The Journal of Translation Studies 24.4 pp.233-266 (2023) : 233.

sun-ju kim. Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity. 2023; 24(4), 233-266. Available from: doi:10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008

sun-ju kim. "Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity" The Journal of Translation Studies 24, no.4 (2023) : 233-266.doi: 10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008

sun-ju kim. Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity. The Journal of Translation Studies, 24(4), 233-266. doi: 10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008

sun-ju kim. Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity. The Journal of Translation Studies. 2023; 24(4) 233-266. doi: 10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008

sun-ju kim. Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity. 2023; 24(4), 233-266. Available from: doi:10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008

sun-ju kim. "Feedback in Master’s Translation Courses: Instructor Approaches and Student Receptivity" The Journal of Translation Studies 24, no.4 (2023) : 233-266.doi: 10.15749/jts.2023.24.4.008