2011, Vol., No.103

Branches and Cultural Prototype of Yemaeck in Pre-Qin Literatures

Moon An-Sik | 2011, (103) | pp.1~42 | number of Cited : 6

The Recognition of Northern Dynasty Appeared in 『Jewangunki(帝王韻紀, the History of Emperor)』

Lim Sang Sun | 2011, (103) | pp.43~74 | number of Cited : 8

The result to examine the recognition of 『Jewangunki』 for the dynasties in the northern region that is connected to Balhae (渤海), Liao (遼), Jin (金) and Yuan (元), in the period from 10 to 13 century is as follows. 『Jewangunki』 incorporated Balhae in the system of Korean history the most actively among existing histories. Inter alia, it highly appreciated that Balhae obeyed to Goryeo(高麗) of their own accord by taking the nation, and as for the record of immigration of wandering people of Balhae to Goryeo in 925, 『Jewangunki』 is the primary historical records. The reason that Lee, Seung Hyu (李承休, 1224∼1300) included Balhae in the system of Korean history might have a certain relation with enhancing national consciousness including Tangun (檀君) under the domestic and international situations. Liao (遼) of the Kitan put emphasis on domination of dynasty in central districts (中原王朝) with ten million mounted troops by that soldiers were powerful and the nation was wealth. Jin (金) of Jusen described more positively compared to Liao for which Goryeo is the land of forefathers and both countries were in the relationship of brotherhood. Yuan (元) established by Mongols watched it as the object of admiration and wonder for it was the prosperous nation like the sun and the moon. It is considered that the recognition of Lee, Seung Hyu like above was based on that Yuan was the world-wide empire that unified the region of central district and in the marriage relationship with royal family of Goryeo. Only, the description for Yuan was not particularly distinct from previous dynasties in the amount, rather that it is fewer is strange. In addition, the thing that there are parts that were different from the historic facts in 『Jewangunki』 etc, it seems that the research level for the Chinese history was not on a high level. 『Jewangunki』 arranged the Chinese dynasties in history in the point of view of authenticity. In spite of that new dynasty was derived, in a case that the period after foundation of country is short and returns to the previous dynasty, it was not authentic country. In a case that ascending the throne, it is called that ‘authenticity’ when unified the world by acceding to the proper line (正脈), and handled Liao as a side story (傍傳) unlike Wudai (五代, five dynasties) and excluded Namsong (南宋) for the authenticity of Northern region was passed down to Jin. The view of authenticity of Lee, Seung Hyu could be found its background in the relation with Yuan. The syntactic system of Korean history that begins to authentic theory of Chinese dynasties or Tangun appeared in 『Jewangunki』 had a great influence on historical presentation and discussion of authentic theory in the latter part of the Goryeo dynasty and Joseon(朝鮮) dynasty.

The Formation and Development of The Yulgok School in 16th and 17th Century

Jeong, Ho-hun | 2011, (103) | pp.75~120 | number of Cited : 17

The Sa-Dae'bu Houses' Burial mountains located in far distances, and Relocation of the graves, during the latter half period of the Joseon dynasty period

Kim Kyeongsook | 2011, (103) | pp.121~160 | number of Cited : 10

일제강점기 재조일본인의 지방사 편찬활동과 조선인식

최혜주 | 2011, (103) | pp.161~207 | number of Cited : 18

The Trend and Tasks in the Account on Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident in High School History Textbooks

Han, Cheol-Ho | 2011, (103) | pp.209~249 | number of Cited : 2

Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident is regarded as an example among the many cases occurred in contemporary Korean history. The truth of the Incident was revealed and the impaired reputation of the victims was regained in 2003. But dispute continues over the cause, nature, and evaluation of that Incident. Reflecting the circumstances, the accounts on the Incident in high school history textbooks show the interrelationship of current situation, curriculum, frame of reference and perspective of the authors. This paper analyzes the trend in the description on Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident in Korean Modern and Contemporary History Textbooks and Korean History Textbooks and suggests some ideas for future textbook writing. First, we need to be more careful in setting up Curriculum and the Writing Guide (or National Standard) that influence the authors' textbook writing significantly. The Curriculum and Writing Guide for Korean Modern and Contemporary History and Korean History were made under the influence of the political situations at that time. The account on Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident has shown deviation. Thus it is suggested that the Curriculum be revised in order to secure the author's autonomy and neutrality to the maximum while providing the minimal writing guideline, on the one hand, and to provide the necessity and justness of the account on the Incident by reflecting recent results such as Reports on the Truth of Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident, on the other. Next, the textbook authors should write correctly with a correct perception on Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident. Some authors don't write even the fact of the Incident reflecting their own disposition. The government is impairing the neutrality of history education by its control and nullifying the intent of the inspection system. But the textbook authors should try to describe the truth of the Incident with a sense of mission as historian and history educator because history textbooks guide history education and have great influence on middle and high school students whose historical perspectives are yet to be formed. Thus textbook authors should describe Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident for the realization of the purpose of history education. Textbooks must lead the students to understand the Incident in diverse perspective and to find its nature and significance for themselves beyond simple memorization. Though the authors are losing their space for writing due to the decrease in the quantity of contemporary history part, they should do their best to provide the measures for fostering the sense of peace by writing about Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident. Lastly, it is suggested that textbook writers, researchers, institutes, and other institutions relevant to Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident have more communication and interchange. By increasing their communication and cooperation with in-depth studies of the Incident, they should develop matters for textbook writing and expand the scope of mutual understanding. This will help the authors write history textbooks by grasping the truth and essence of Jeju 4ㆍ3 Incident in spite of relatively insufficient space permitted in history textbook.

KJCKorea
Journal Central

The Review of Korean History 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.02

2011, Vol., No.103