The Journal of Translation Studies 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.49
-
pISSN : 1229-795X
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/kats
KJCKorea
Journal Central
A Pilot Investigation into Korean to English Post-editing Efforts
- The Journal of Translation Studies
- Abbr : JTS
- 2021, 22(5), pp.271-298
- DOI : 10.15749/jts.2021.22.5.010
- Publisher : The Korean Association for Translation Studies
- Research Area : Humanities > Interpretation and Translation Studies
- Received : November 7, 2021
- Accepted : December 12, 2021
- Published : December 31, 2021
1한국외대
Accredited
ABSTRACT
Machine translation post-editing(MTPE) service is already available in the Korean market. However, it is still challenging to have access to reliable Korean to English MTPE productivity and quality data. Therefore, it is premature to assume that Korean to English MTPE service will be more productive and of similar quality to human translation. To make matters worse, the lack of understanding about MTPE can misguide the market and future translation training. To that end, this research tries to shed light on crucial efforts required for MTPE: temporal, technical, and cognitive. First, the temporal data and expert quality assessment will provide basic insight about productivity between human translation and MTPE. Second, the keystroke data will show the difference in keystrokes between the two translation modes, if there are any. Third, the pause data will tell us if participants made different levels or patterns of cognitive efforts. Finally, based on these data sets, this research will suggest what can be a reasonable way to understand Korean to English MTPE.
Statistics
-
305 Viewed
-
209 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
김순미
/ 2019
/
A University-Industry Joint Study on Machine Translation Post-Editing Productivity and MT Engine Error Rate
/ 번역학연구
/ 한국번역학회
20(1)
: 41~76
[journal]
김자경
/ 2020
/
Study on Expert-Novice Differences in Searching and Self-revision during Korean-to-English Translation Process
/ T&I REVIEW
/ 통역번역연구소
10(1)
: 219~232
[journal]
김자경
/ 2020
/
A Study on Differences of Professional and Student Translators in Metaphor Translation Process
/ 번역학연구
/ 한국번역학회
21(1)
: 31~59
[journal]
남보리
/ 2021
/ LSP 관점에서 바라본 기계번역 포스트에디팅의 전략적 지향점-스타일 가이드 지침 연구 및 LSP 기계번역 서비스 사례
/ 번역∙ 언어∙ 기술
2
: 5~43
[journal]
마승혜
/ 2018
/
An Empirical Investigation of Kor-Eng Machine Translation Post-Editing: Focused on the Analysis of MT-PE of Undergraduates
/ 통번역학연구
/ 통번역연구소
22(1)
: 53~88
[journal]
이상빈
/ 2018
/
Process research into post-editing: How do undergraduate students post-edit the output of Google Translate?
/ 번역학연구
/ 한국번역학회
19(3)
: 259~286
[thesis]
이준호
/ 2021
/ 포스트에디팅 교육 실행연구: 석사과정 영한 포스트에디팅 수업 최적화 방안에 대한 고찰
/ 박사
/ 한국외국어대학교 대학원
[journal]
이준호
/ 2021
/
An Investigation into English to Korean Post-editing Productivity: Time Effort
/ 통번역학연구
/ 통번역연구소
25(2)
: 55~83
[confproc]
Aranberri, Nora
/ 2014
/ Comparison of post-editing productivity between professional translators and lay users
/ Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas
: 20~33
[journal]
Carl Michael
/ 2011
/ The process of post-editing: A pilot study
/ Copenhagen Studies in Language
41
: 131~142
[journal]
Carl, Michael
/ 2012
/ Translog-II : a Program for Recording User Activity Data for Empirical Reading and Writing Research
/ LREC
12
: 4108~4112
[book]
Carl, Michael
/ 2015
/ Psycholinguistic and cognitive inquiries into translation and interpreting
/ John Benjamins
: 115~145
[confproc]
Carl, Michael
/ 2016
/ English-to-Japanese translation vs. dictation vs. post-editing: Comparing translation modes in a multilingual setting
/ Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation
: 4024~4031
[journal]
Carter, Meagan
/ 2020
/ Translating the Violent Content of Grim Brother’s Frairy Tales: An Eye-tracker Exepreiement
/ Cadernos de Tradução
40
: 17~33
[journal]
Fonseca, Norma Barbosa de Lima
/ 2019
/ Analysing the impact of TAPs on temporal, technical and cognitive effort in monolingual post-editing
/ Perspectives
27(4)
: 552~588
[confproc]
Gaspari, Federico
/ 2014
/ Perception vs reality: Measuring machine translation post-editing productivity
/ Third Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice
60
: 60~72
[confproc]
Green, Spence
/ 2013
/ The efficacy of human post-editing for language translation
/ Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems
: 439~448
[journal]
Guerberof-Arenas, Ana
/ 2008
/ Productivity and quality in the post-editing of outputs from translation memories and machine translation
/ Localisation Focus
7(1)
: 11~21
[journal]
Guerberof-Arenas, Ana
/ 2014
/ Correlations between productivity and quality when post-editing in a professional context
/ Machine Translation
28(3-4)
: 165~186
[journal]
Jia, Yanfang
/ 2019
/ How does the post-editing of neural machine translation compare with from-scratch translation? A product and process study
/ The Journal of Specialised Translation
31
: 60~86
[journal]
Koglin, Arlene
/ 2015
/ An empirical investigation of cognitive effort required to post-edit machine translated metaphors compared to the translation of metaphors
/ Translation & Interpreting
7(1)
: 126~141
[journal]
Koponen, Maarit
/ 2019
/ A product and process analysis of post-editor corrections on neural, statistical and rule-based machine translation output
/ Machine Translation
33(1)
: 61~90
[book]
Koehn, Philipp
/ 2009
/ Statistical machine translation
/ Cambridge UP
[book]
Krings, Hans
/ 2001
/ Repairing texts: Empirical investigations of machine translation post-editing processes
/ Kent State UP
[confproc]
Lacruz, Isabel
/ 2012
/ Average pause ratio as an indicator of cognitive effort in post-editing: A case study
/ Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice
[book]
Lacruz, Isabel
/ 2014
/ Post-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications
/ Cambridge Scholars Publishing
: 246~272
[confproc]
Lacruz Isabel
/ 2014
/ Cognitive demand and cognitive effort in post-editing
/ Proceedings of the third workshop on post-editing technology and practice
/ AMTA
: 73~84
[journal]
Nitzke, Jean
/ 2016
/ Monolingual post-editing : An exploratory study on research behaviour and target text quality
/ Eyetracking and Applied Linguistics
2
: 83~108
[journal]
O’Brien, Sharon
/ 2006
/ Pauses as indicators of cognitive effort in post-editing machine translation output
/ Across Languages and Cultures
7(1)
: 1~21
[journal]
O’Brien, Sharon
/ 2011
/ Towards predicting post-editing productivity
/ Machine translation
25(3)
: 197~215
[journal]
Plitt, Mirko
/ 2010
/ A productivity test of statistical machine translation post-editing in a typical localisation context
/ The Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics
93
: 7~16
[journal]
Screen, Benjamin Alun
/ 2016
/ What does Translation Memory do to translation? : The effect of Translation Memory output on specific aspects of the translation process
/ Translation & Interpreting
8(1)
: 1~18
[journal]
Vieira, Lucas Nunes
/ 2016
/ How do measures of cognitive effort relate to each other? A multivariate analysis of post-editing process data
/ Machine Translation
30(1-2)
: 41~62
[book]
Vieira, Lucas Nunes
/ 2017
/ Translation in transition: Between cognition, computing and technology
/ John Benjamins
: 162~186
[journal]
Yildiz, Mehmet
/ 2020
/ How Do Translation Students’ Cognitive Efforts Vary?-An Answer in Consideration of Pauses
/ Journal of Education and Practice
11(2)
: 48~55
[other]
신수정
/ 2021
/ 인공지능(AI), 전문성과 정확성 두 마리 토끼 잡는다
/ 산업종합저널
[web]
/ 2019
/ 스마트라이온
/ https://smartlion.co.kr/news-%EA%B8%B0%EA%B3%84%EB%B2%88%EC%97%ADtrends/
[web]
TAUS
/ 2013
/ TAUS Best Practice Guidelines
/ https://www.taus.net/index.php?option=com_rsfiles&layout=preview&tmpl=component&path=Articles%2FFinal-TAUS-PricingMTPE-Guidelines-September2013.pdf